Religion as Social Control through Authority
Contemporary historians discuss social control from the perspective of religion by exploring the enormous potential and applied power religion has to influence the individual as well as society at large though dogma and indoctrination. Perhaps the only tie stronger is the family unit; however the two (religion and family) often work in concert to create an almost undeniable force of control over an individual. Karl Marx discusses religion as the “opiate of the masses”. He argues that religion is a force that keeps the masses docile, not by 1984-esque government to individual micromanagement, but rather by placing the individual in charge of their own salvation and teaching them there is only one way to achieve it. Slave morality, a false consciousness which keeps entire societies under the influence by convincing them they are only being tested by hardship because they are the ‘chosen people’ (i.e. Judaism), can actually work to allow a persecuted group to embrace the persecution by means of translating it into a force that sanctifies the bond with God.
Bible adhering religions can be said to have social control perfected hundreds of years before governments. Several passages can be said to reinforce the authority of religion, Catholicism by mediation by church official, Protestantism by personal relationship with god (Kurtz 155). “Trust in the LORD with all your heart and lean not on your own understanding.” (Proverbs 3:5), the individual is required to defer personal judgment and accept the interpretation of life affecting doctrine either by the authority of the church which is, as history has demonstrated, deemed appropriate by way on context for the desired behavioral effect. Thomas Aquinas, in the Summa Theologica, enforces ‘moral law’ through interpretation of the bible to garner authority not only in the religious magesterium, but directly into the social/business behavior still observed presently.
Religion has always exerted control over our scientific progress. This could be observed to violate present day religious apologist’s Steven Jay Gould’s NOMA (Non-Overlapping Magesteria) which suggests science and religion occupy separate realms of human experience (Science and Creationism). Those critical of this theory point out that the two realms do indeed have mutual overlapping impact on our world.
Sources:
Kurtz, Lester. Gods in the Global Village. 2nd . California: Pine Forge Press, 2007. Print.
Steering Committee on Science and Creationism, National Academy of Sciences (1999). “Science and Creationism: A View from the National Academy of Sciences”. NAS. http://newton.nap.edu/openbook/0309064066/html/R9.html. Retrieved on 2007-11-16.
“Religion as Social Control through Authority”