Friction.Point
.:From Controversy to Understanding:.

Religion as Social Control through Authority

May 3rd 2009 in Religion

Contemporary historians discuss social control from the perspective of religion by exploring the enormous potential and applied power religion has to influence the individual as well as society at large though dogma and indoctrination. Perhaps the only tie stronger is the family unit; however the two (religion and family) often work in concert to create an almost undeniable force of control over an individual. Karl Marx discusses religion as the “opiate of the masses”. He argues that religion is a force that keeps the masses docile, not by 1984-esque government to individual micromanagement, but rather by placing the individual in charge of their own salvation and teaching them there is only one way to achieve it. Slave morality, a false consciousness which keeps entire societies under the influence by convincing them they are only being tested by hardship because they are the ‘chosen people’ (i.e. Judaism), can actually work to allow a persecuted group to embrace the persecution by means of translating it into a force that sanctifies the bond with God.

Bible adhering religions can be said to have social control perfected hundreds of years before governments. Several passages can be said to reinforce the authority of religion, Catholicism by mediation by church official, Protestantism by personal relationship with god (Kurtz 155). “Trust in the LORD with all your heart and lean not on your own understanding.” (Proverbs 3:5), the individual is required to defer personal judgment and accept the interpretation of life affecting doctrine either by the authority of the church which is, as history has demonstrated, deemed appropriate by way on context for the desired behavioral effect. Thomas Aquinas, in the Summa Theologica, enforces ‘moral law’ through interpretation of the bible to garner authority not only in the religious magesterium, but directly into the social/business behavior still observed presently.

Religion has always exerted control over our scientific progress. This could be observed to violate present day religious apologist’s Steven Jay Gould’s NOMA (Non-Overlapping Magesteria) which suggests science and religion occupy separate realms of human experience (Science and Creationism). Those critical of this theory point out that the two realms do indeed have mutual overlapping impact on our world.


Sources:

Kurtz, Lester. Gods in the Global Village. 2nd . California: Pine Forge Press, 2007. Print.

Steering Committee on Science and Creationism, National Academy of Sciences (1999). “Science and Creationism: A View from the National Academy of Sciences”. NAS. http://newton.nap.edu/openbook/0309064066/html/R9.html. Retrieved on 2007-11-16.


9 comments to...
“Religion as Social Control through Authority”
Avatar
Joseph Jacquez

I am impressed by your ability to touch on such powerful and profound issues that have existed in Social Culture for thousands of years!

Control through Indoctrination & Dogma. What comes to mind, even though fiction is The Di Vince Code”. The willingness to go to extra ordinary measures to protect/control power (information) and the social fallout that potentially exists should such information become public.

Love the reference to Karl Marx-”Opiate of the Masses”! This is a profound statement that exists is every religion organized by Man. I have read in journals of medical science, studies regarding the chemical effects on the brain regarding what a person is willing to do in the “Name of God”. What comes to mind is the willingness to so easily take another life, due to strong deep religious conviction, when God in almost every written doctrine teaches compassion and love. I think the intolerance and control is put in place by Man and has nothing to do w/ God or what he or she would want done in his name.

I like how you close touching on science vs religion. This is a current issue today regarding the use of human stem cells and cloning. Where do we draw the line and who should be able to be the decider?

Nice Job!

J


Avatar
Waylon Brooks

It is well known that throughout human experience religion, in its various shapes and forms, has been a tremendous and influencing factor on societal development and control. Not only that, but it served as a “pseudo-science” before there was developed a rational, truly scientific means to explain natural phenomena.

What interests me is that in modern times so many people, even with rational scientific explanation of said phenomena, still choose to submit to religious indoctrination in spite of all evidence contradicting religious theory. This conscious denial of fact almost seems to me to be mass, organized (in the case of organized religious groups) psychosis – which is defined by Webster-Merriam as “defective or lost contact with reality”.

In my personal view religious belief should be treated as a potentially dangerous mental illness.


Avatar
Anonymous

You think too much about things, you self-righteous little twit.


Avatar
Jacob

Anonymous, would you mean to imply non-thinking is a virtue?


Avatar
justice

i’m wondering if you are speaking about religion in terms of church or God/higher power. because they are two VERY different things. by nature, God can’t be controlling the masses (and if he wanted to, he absolutely could) because he’s given us free will. church, on the other hand, does (sometimes). so try not to put God into your accusations since it’s people who’ve messed up his plan, not himself.

anyway, i think we’ve talked before. i like the premise of your blog, i hope you don’t mind if i check back.


Avatar
Douglas

The thought of using Religion to control societies behavior has long been a thought of mine, but consider the fact that the differences in Religion often creates dispute, dispute creates chaos, and chaos creates destruction. The Romans tried to force everyone into the same religion, if they would have succeeded they would have ultimately been able to control society through force and religion. Was religion made up to control people? Is threatening people with a higher judge really the way to control ones inner self?


Avatar
Jacob

Here is an interesting thought, what if religion is used individually by people to control themselves? Individually we know our behavior includes self-control, and in society we even accept that one can have a differing level or ability of self-control. You could say the job of a marketing and advertising is to arrest one’s self-control long enough to gain a dollar from it. But what can be more powerful than handing that responsibility to someone higher than you (real or imaginary). All the sudden you are on a diet that you don’t control and your adherence has consequences that extend to your afterlife.


Avatar
Rachel

This is an interesting discussion, I’m excited for the next topic :)


Avatar
Anonymous

Here is a thought. What if everything, the world and life as we know it, is all part of a spider’s dream and when he wakes up…we die. WWWHHHHHHOOOOOOAAAAAAAA! It blows the mind.




required



required - won't be displayed


Your Comment:

An Armed Society is a Polite Society

-This post was contributed by Doug, FrictionPoint’s first contributing author.

Forward: I base this discussion on my own personal belief of owning firearms for the reason of personal preservation.

Many individuals will read the following statement and revolt in disgust. I am not one of those. My ideals are based on personal events, opinions, and real life [...]

An Armed Society is a Polite SocietyNext Entry

Categories